Introduction
Endodontic infections refer to those that occur within the tooth pulp, root canal system or at the root apex. Normally the pulp and root canal system are sterile. However, bacteria may enter through cracks around restorations, areas of exposed dentin and possibly microfracture, or through trauma to the tooth. Endodontic infections have a polymicrobial nature, with obligate anaerobic bacteria dominating the microbiota in primary infections. The most prevalent cultivable bacteria from root canals are Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus, Parvimonas micra, Streptococcus mitis, S. intermedius, and other streptococci [1-4]. It is noteworthy that the well-known periodontal pathogen, P. gingivalis, is one of the commonest bacteria detected in endodontic infections and it can participate in the pathogenesis of apical periodontitis [5].
The main cellular components of the pulp are peripherally located odontoblasts and stromal fibroblasts. There are also undifferentiated mesenchymal and immune cells. Cells in human dental pulp that express Toll-like receptors contribute to trigger immune responses to bacteria [6,7]. Increased expression of pro-inflammatory mediators are found in inflamed pulp, including cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [8].
PGE2 has been implicated in most of the inflammatory and destructive changes that occur in periapical lesions, such as vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and bone resorption [9]. Cyclooxygenase (COX) is a key enzyme in prostaglandin biosynthesis. COX-1 and COX-2 catalyze the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins and related eicosanoids. COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most cells and plays a role in basal physiological functions in several cells and tissues. COX-2, on the other hand, is usually expressed at low or undetectable levels in most tissues and cells, but is significantly induced by inflammatory stimuli [10].
In spite of the importance of P. gingivalis and PGE2 in endodontic pathogenesis, there have been no reports that determined PGE2 production by P. gingivlais in pulp cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the production of PGE2 by P. gingivalis and the involved mechanisms in human dental pulp cells (HDPCs).
Materials and Methods
Reagents
PD98059, SB203580, SP600125, GF109203X, and U73122 were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Wortmannin, genistein, and SC-514 were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO,USA). Antibodies to phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), phospho-p38, phospho-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Antibodies to phospho-NF-κB p65 and inhibitor of κB-α (IκB-α) were also from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was from Sigma.
Bacterial culture
P. gingivalis 381 was grown in Trypticase soy broth supplemented with yeast extract (1 mg/ml), hemin (5 μg/ml), and menadione (1 μg/ml). The bacteria were incubated anaerobically (85% N2, 10% H2, and 5% CO2) at 37°C.
HDPCs culture
HDPCs were kindly provided by professor Ji-Yeon Jung (Department of Oral Physiology, Chonnam National University Dental School). HDPCs were grown in minimum essential medium α (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2.
RT-PCR
HDPC cells were plated onto 3-cm dishes (5×105cells/dish). The next day, the cells were stimulated with P. gingivalis for various times. Total RNA was prepared with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as specified by the manufacturer and was quantified spectctrophotometrically. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of RNA using random primers (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and Molony murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega). 2 μl of cDNA products were amplified in 25 μl volumes under a layer of mineral oil using a GeneAmp 2700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Each PCR reaction mixture contained 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM each dNTP, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 0.5 μM of each primer. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at 94℃ (30 s), annealing at 57℃ (30 s), and extension at 72℃ (60 s). The sequences of primers were 5′-TTCAAATGAGATTGTGGGAAAATTGCT- 3′, 5′-AGTTCATCTCTGCCTGAGTATCTT-3′ for COX-2 (305 bp); 5′-GAGTCTTTCTCCAACGTGAGC-3′, 5′-ACCGGTAC TTGAGTTTCCCA-3′ for COX-1 (350 bp); and 5′-AGCGGGAAA TCGTGCGTG-3′, 5′-CAGGGTACATGGTGGTGCC-3′ for β -actin (300 bp). The PCR products of 10 μl were fractionated on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels containing RedSafe (Intron Biotechnology, Korea), visualized by UV transillumination, and photographed.
ELISA
The HDPCs were seeded in 12-well plates (3×105 cells/well). The next day, the cells were stimulated with P. gingivalis for various times. Cell culture supernatants were sampled and centrifuged at 100 ×g for 10 min for clarification of debris. The levels of PGE2 was quantified using commercial ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s directions.
Western blot
HDPC cells were plated onto 10-cm dishes (2×106 cells/dish). The next day, the cells were stimulated with P. gingivalis for various times. The cells were harvested and lysed with 300 μl of Cell Lysis Buffer (Cell Signaling Technology). 30-50 μg of each boiled sample was resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was probed with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against phospho-ERK, phosphor-p38, phosphor-JNK, phosphor-p65, or IκBα (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) and a 1:1500 dilution or horseradish peroxidaseconjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). Immunoreactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (LumiGLO, Cell Signaling Technology). The same membrane was stripped and reprobed with anti-GAPDH (1:2000)
Statistical analysis
Our experiments were conducted in three independent experiments to confirm the reproducibility of the results. The data are presented as means with standard deviations (SD). Statistical analysis of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test was performed using GraphPad InStat (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Induction of COX-2 mRNA expression
First, we determined whether P. gingivalis could induce COX-2 and COX-1 mRNAs in HDPCs. HDPCs were infected with increasing MOIs of P. gingivalis for 3 h. Total RNA was isolated and levels of COX-1 and COX-2 mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. Expression of COX-2 mRNA was induced by P. gingivalis in a multiplicity of infection (MOI)-dependent manner. A relatively low MOI of 1:10 could induce COX-2 mRNA. In contrast, COX-1 mRNA was constitutively expressed and not altered by P. gingivalis infection (Fig. 1 A). In order to determine the time course of COX-2 mRNA expression, HDPCs were infected with P. gingivalis (MOI=1:100) for various time periods from 2 h to 16 h. Strong COX-2 expression was demonstrated at 2-4 h postinfection but the COX-2 message did not appear at 8-h and 16-h time points (Fig. 1 B).
Production of PGE2
To determine whether the induction of COX-2 mRNA leads to increased production of PGE2, PGE2 concentrations of the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. P. gingivalis stimulated HDPCs to produce PGE2. Three to four-fold increase of PGE2 production was demonstrated in P. gingivalis-infected cells at both time points of 12 h and 24 h. Moreover, this PGE2 increase was completely blocked by celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor (Fig.2).
Activation of MAPKs and NF-κB pathways
As activation of mitogen-activated kinases (MAPKs)and NF- κB plays important roles in the induction of COX-2, we determined whether MAPKs and NF-κB pathways are activated by P. gingivalis in HDPCs. Western blot analysis demonstrated that P. gingivalis induced phosphorylation of all three types of MAPKs (ERK, p38, and JNK) through the time course of 30-90 min. Phosphorylation of p65 NF-κB and degradation of IκB-α were also demonstrated (Fig. 3).Fig. 4
Effects of various signaling inhibitors
In order to evaluate the relative importance of various signaling pathways in P. gingivalis-induced PGE2 production in HDPCs, specific pharmacological inhibitors were used. HDPCs were pretreated with GF109203X (proteinkinase C, 1 μM), wortmannin (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, 100 nM), U73122 (phospholipase C, 10 μM), genistein (protein tyrosine kinase, 50 μM), PD98059 (ERK, 50 μM), SB203580 (p38 MAPK, 10 μM), SP600125 (JNK, 10 μM), or SC-514 (NF-κB, 30 μM) for 1 h, and then the cells were incubated with P. gingivalis for 12 h. PGE2 concentrations of the culture supernatants were measured by ELISA. Among the inhibitors, SB203580, PD98059, SP600125, genistein, and SC-514 blocked PGE2 production stimulated by P. gingivalis. In contrast, PGE2 production was significantly elevated in the presence of U73122 and wortmannin.
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that P. gingivalis stimulates HDPCs to express COX-2 and to produce PGE2 without affecting COX-1 expression. The induction of PGE2 production was COX-2-mediated, as it was completely blocked by celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor. The use of selective COX-2 inhibitors has resulted in pain relief after endodontic treatment [11].
This study demonstrated the importance of MAPKs and NF-κ B in P. gingivalis-stimulated PGE2 production by HDPCs. Increased phosphorylation of ERK, p38, and JNK was observed in P. gingivalis-infected HDPCs and pharmacological inhibition of MAPKs blocked the PGE2 production. COX-2 is the primary COX controlling PGE2 synthesis in response to inflammatory stimuli. Transcription of COX-2 gene requires binding of transcription factors, including NF-κB, C/EBP, and CREB, to the promoter region of COX-2 gene [12]. As MAPKs regulate these transcription factors, activated MAPKs may positively regulate the activity of the transcription factors in P. gingivalis-stimulated HDPCs [13]. The present study showed involvement of NF-κB activation in P. gingivalis-induced PGE2 production. The NF-κB activation was demonstrated by the results of p65 phosphorylation and IκB-α degradation [14]. Activation of NF-κB mainly occurs via phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of IκB-α. Optimal induction of NF-κB target genes also requires phosphorylation of NF-κB proteins, such as p65 [15].
The present study showed that genistein strongly inhibited the PGE2 induction, implying involvement of protein tyrosine kinases. A previous report showed that genistein treatment exerted a significant inhibitory effect on NF-κB activation, leading to downregulation of COX-2 in gastric cancer cells [16]. Therefore, the inhibitory action of genistein in our study may also be mediated by inhibition of NF-κB activation. Interestingly, PGE2 production by P. gingivalis was significantly increased by inhibition of phospholipase C or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Further studies are needed to define the role of these signaling pathways in PGE2 production by HDPCs.
The present study showed for the first time that P. gingivalis stimulated HDPCs to express COX-2, leading to induced production of PGE2. These results suggest that P. gingivalis should promote endodontic inflammation, at least in part, by stimulating dental pulp cells to produce PGE2.